Combining Fuzzy AHP-Fuzzy COPRAS Model for Personnel Selection: A Case Study

Mohammad Reza Fathi, Leila Amereh, Mohammad Hasan Maleki


The main purpose of this study is to propose a suitable model for Personnel Selection based on fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. In this paper, the weights of each criterion are calculated using Fuzzy AHP. After that, Fuzzy COPRAS is utilized to rank the alternatives. Then we select the best Personnel based on these results. The outcome of this research is ranking and selecting Personnel with the help of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS techniques. This paper offers a new integrated method for Personnel selection.

Full Text:



Afshari, A. R., Mojahed, M., Yusuff, R. M., Hong, T. S., & Ismail, M. Y. (2010). Personnel selection using ELECTRE. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 3068-3075.‏

Balezentis, A., Balezentis, T., & Brauers, W. K. (2012). MULTIMOORA-FG: A multi-objective decision making method for linguistic reasoning with an application to personnel selection. Informatica, 23(2), 173-190.

Baležentis, A., Baležentis, T., & Brauers, W. K. (2012).Personnel selection based on computing with words and fuzzy MULTIMOORA. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 7961-7967.‏

Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), 233-247.‏

Caki, N., &Solmaz, B. (2013). The Effects of Facial Beauty in Personnel Selection: A Field Work in Retail Sector. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1203-1206.

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655.‏

De Soete, B., Lievens, F., & Druart, C. (2013). Strategies for dealing with the diversity-validity dilemma in personnel selection: Where are we and where should we go?.Revista de PsicologíadelTrabajo y de las Organizaciones, 29(1), 3-12.

Drentea, P. (1998). Consequences of women's formal and informal job search methods for employment in female-dominated jobs. Gender & Society, 12(3), 321-338.

Dursun, M., & Karsak, E. E. (2010).A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), 4324-4330.

‏Güngör, Z., Serhadlıoğlu, G., & Kesen, S. E. (2009).A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 641-646.

Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1‐2), 152-194.

Jessop, A. (2004). Minimally biased weight determination in personnel selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 433-444.

Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics information management, 16(6), 382-394.‏

Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Naimavicienė, J., Krutinis, M., Plakys, V., & Venskus, D. (2010). Model for a complex analysis of intelligent built environment. Automation in construction, 19(3), 326-340.‏

Kalugina, E., & Shvydun, S. (2014). An Effective Personnel Selection Model. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1102-1106.

Kara, S. S. (2011). Supplier selection with an integrated methodology in unknown environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2133-2139.‏

Karsak, E. E. (2002). Distance-based fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives. International Journal of Production Research 40(13), 3167–3181.

Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1988).Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Kelemenis, A., & Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4999-5008.

‏Kulik, C. T., Roberson, L., & Perry, E. L. (2007). The multiple-category problem: Category activation and inhibition in the hiring process. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 529-548.

Le, H., Oh, I. S., Shaffer, J., & Schmidt, F. (2007). Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 6-15.

Lin, H. T. (2010). Personnel selection using analytic network process and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approaches. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59(4), 937-944.

Messner, C., Wänke, M., & Weibel, C. (2011).Unconscious personnel selection. Social Cognition, 29(6), 699-710.

Önüt, S., & Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28(9), 1552-1559.‏

Oostrom, J. K., Van Der Linden, D., Born, M. P., & Van Der Molen, H. T. (2013). New technology in personnel selection: How recruiter characteristics affect the adoption of new selection technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2404-2415.‏

Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity–validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 153-172.

Pyburn, K. M., Ployhart, R. E., &Kravitz, D. A. (2008). The diversity–validity dilemma: Overview and legal context. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 143-151.

Robertson, I. T., & Smith, M. (2001).Personnel selection.Journal of occupational and Organizational psychology, 74(4), 441-472.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw- Hill.

Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., &Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. American Psychologist, 56(4), 302.

Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied psychology, 82(1), 30.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 262.

Schulz, W., Maas, I., & van Leeuwen, M. H. (2014).Employer's choice–Selection through job advertisements in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 36, 49-68.

Stanciu, S., Ionescu, M., Leovaridis, C., & Stanescu, D. (2001). Managementul reurselor umane [Human resources management].‏

Sun, C. C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert systems with applications, 37(12), 7745-7754.‏

Sun, C. C., & Lin, G. T. (2009). Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11764-11771.‏

Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel psychology, 44(4), 703-742.‏

Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 11(1), 199-227.‏

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.

Zavadskas, E. K., & Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multicriteria assessment. In International Symposium for “The Organization and Management of Construction”. Shaping Theory and Practice (Vol. 2, pp. 94-104).‏

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitiene, J., & Marina, V. (2008).Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 462-477.

Zhang, S. F., & Liu, S. Y. (2011). A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11401-11405.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Copyright ©2013 Academic Journals Center

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.