An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR for Personnel Selection Problem

Kayvan Salehi


Personnel selection problem is one of most important tasks human resource management. Personnel selection for a decision maker can be viewed as a complicated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem which requires consideration of a number of conflicting tangible and intangible selection criteria. Moreover, decision makers tend to use linguistic term sets for expressing their assessments because of their different backgrounds and preferences, some of which may be uncertain and incomplete. Hence, this paper focuses on developing a hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach by combining AHP and VIKOR for solving the personnel selection problem. Finally, A numerical example is proposed to illustrate an application of the proposed method.

Full Text:



Armstrong, M. (1996). A handbook of personnel management practice. Kogan Page.

Chen, L. S., & Cheng, C. H. (2005). Selecting IS personnel use fuzzy GDSS based on metric distance method. European Journal of Operational Research, 160(3), 803-820.

Cheng, C-H. (1998). New approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol.95, pp.307-317.

Chu, M.T., Shyu, J., Tzeng, G.H., Khosla, R. (2007). Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 1011–1024.

Dağdeviren, M. (2010). A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing, 21(4), 451-460.

Dursun, M., & Karsak, E. E. (2010). A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), 4324-4330.

Gibney, R., & Shang, J. (2007). Decision-making in academia: A case of the dean selection process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 1030–1040.

Gungor, Z., Serhadlıog˘lu, G., & Kesen, S. E. (2009). A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection. Applied Soft Computing, 9, 641–646.

Jessop, A. (2004). Minimally biased weight determination in personnel selection. European Journal of Operations Research, 153, 433–444.

Kabak, M., Burmaog˘lu, S., Kazancog˘lu, Y., (2012). A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 3516–3525.

Karsak, E. E. (2000). A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for personnel selection. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA (pp. 2007–2012).

Kelemenis, A., & Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4999-5008.

Liang, G. S., & Wang, M. J. J. (1994). Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 78, 22–33.

Lin H.T., (2010). Personnel selection using analytic network process and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approaches, Computers & Industrial Engineering 59, 937–944.

Liu, H. C., Qin, J. T., Mao, L. X., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2015). Personnel Selection Using Interval 2‐Tuple Linguistic VIKOR Method. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(3), 370-384.

Lu, J., Zhang, G., Ruan, D., Wu, F. (2007). Multi-Objective Group Decision Making Methods. Software and Applications with Fuzzy Set Techniques, Copyright by Imperial College Press.

Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1). Cengage Learning.

Opricovic, S. (1998). Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2002). Multicriteria planning of postearthquake sustainable reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17, 211–220.

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). The compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.

Rouyendegh, B. D., & Erkan, T. E. (2013). An application of the fuzzy electre method for academic staff selection. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(2), 107-115.

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Tiryaki, F., & Ahlatcioglu, B. (2009). Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 179, 53–69.

Yu, D., Zhang, W., & Xu, Y. (2013). Group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with application to personnel evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 52, 1-10.

Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Copyright ©2022 Academic Journals Center

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.